November 3, 2025 | Page 31

Port Productivity: 2024 Rankings
Special Report
CPPI Top 200 Global Container Ports 2024
The Container Port Performance Index( CPPI), produced jointly by The World Bank and S & P Global, parent company of the Journal of Commerce, is based on the total number of hours spent in port per ship call, cross-referenced with workload achieved. The CPPI was constructed using two different methodological approaches— an“ administrative” approach reflecting expert knowledge and judgment and a“ statistical” approach using factor analysis— to ensure the— rankings accurately reflect actual port performance, while also being statistically robust. The aggregate ranking presented here is a composite of the administrative and statistical indices.
2024
2024
2024
2024
Rank
Port
Rank
Port
Rank
Port
Rank
Port
1
Yangshan
51
Keelung
101
San Juan
151
Riga
2
Fuzhou
52
Nagoya
102
Malaga
152
Bar
3
Port Said
53
King Abdullah Port
103
Tanjung Priok
153
Deendayal
4
Dalian
54
Beirut
104
Dunkirk
154
Chennai
5
Tanger-Mediterranean
55
Halifax
105
Izmir
155
Sharjah
6
Mawan
56
Cochin
106
Tanjung Perak
156
Philipsburg
7
Cai Mep
57
Gemlik
107
Naha
157
Chu Lai
8
Guangzhou
58
Qingdao
108
Dakar
158
Apra Harbor
9
Chiwan
59
Zhoushan
109
Mobile
159
Cagayan De Oro
10
Ningbo
60
Imbituba
110
Puerto Cortes
160
Valparaiso
11
Hamad Port
61
Wilhelmshaven
111
Hakata
161
Dammam
12
Hong Kong
62
Barcelona
112
Papeete
162
Basseterre
13
Tanjung Pelepas
63
Gothenburg
113
Las Palmas
163
Mogadiscio
14
Tianjin
64
Jubail
114
Kalundborg
164
Buenos Aires
15
Salalah
65
Itapoa
115
Iskenderun
165
Gustavia
16
Yokohama
66
Puerto Limon
116
Saigon
166
Sagunto
17
Xiamen
67
Port Everglades
117
Diliskelesi
167
Rio Haina
18
Kaohsiung
68
Khalifa Port
118
Noumea
168
Arrecife De Lanzarote
19
Yantian
69
Khalifa Bin Salman
119
Boston
169
Ploce
20
Algeciras
70
Visakhapatnam
120
Salerno
170
Tanjung Emas
21
Posorja
71
Yarimca
121
Taichung
171
Copenhagen
22
Yeosu
72
Tripoli
122
Cat Lai
172
Arica
23
Jawaharlal Nehru Port
73
Jacksonville
123
Antwerp
173
Bremerhaven
24
Aarhus
74
Muhammad Bin Qasim
124
Ambarli
174
Puerto Progreso
25
Mundra
75
Lirquen
125
Moji
175
General San Martin
26
Philadelphia
76
Hazira
126
Pyeong Taek
176
Gavle
27
Busan
77
Mersin
127
Limassol
177
Toamasina
28
Buenaventura
78
Johor
128
Danang
178
Big Creek
29
Singapore
79
Sines
129
Omaezaki
179
Mongla
30
Haiphong
80
Colombo
130
Santa Marta
180
Vigo
31
Da Chan Bay Terminal One
81
Altamira
131
Fredericia
181
Oslo
32
Pipavav
82
Piraeus
132
Zeebrugge
182
Oita
33
Incheon
83
London
133
Klaipeda
183
Halmstad
34
Taipei
84
Veracruz
134
Helsingborg
184
Marsaxlokk
35
Shekou
85
Wilmington
135
Tallinn
185
Ferrol
36
Jeddah
86
Tokyo
136
Port Akdeniz
186
Burgas
37
Callao
87
Savona-Vado
137
Rizhao
187
Gdynia
38
Lianyungang
88
New Orleans
138
Puerto Bolivar
188
Rosario
39
Port Klang
89
Haifa
139
New York & New Jersey
189
Kompong Som
40
Coronel
90
Shantou
140
Borusan
190
El Dekheila
41
Laem Chabang
91
Penang
141
Cadiz
191
Baltimore
42
Shimizu
92
Quanzhou
142
Shuwaikh
192
Varna
43
Aqaba
93
Miami
143
Qinzhou
193
Hibikinada
44
Paita
94
Kamarajar
144
Cebu
194
Tauranga
45
Derince
95
Pointe-A-Pitre
145
Puerto Barrios
195
Subic Bay
46
Cartagena
96
Yokkaichi
146
Shuaiba
196
Bell Bay
47
Gdansk
97
Nantes-St Nazaire
147
Southampton
197
Rotterdam
48
Sohar
98
Fort-De-France
148
Koper
198
Augusta
49
Gioia Tauro
99
Karachi
149
Ensenada
199
Nemrut Bay
50
Kobe
100 Siam Seaport
150
Quy Nhon
200 Pozzallo
Source: S & P Global, The World Bank
www. joc. com November 3, 2025 | Journal of Commerce 31